Search
  • Sam Packer

The Winners of WWII are Still Waging War



We are drowning in corruption. Corruption in government, in the healthcare industry, in the education industry and in nearly every aspect of our society today. To find any element of truth requires us each to become our own research journalists.


History that is taught to be unquestioned today and, in fact, unlawful to question in many places, is what was written by the winners of wars that now, we know nothing about. We have accepted propaganda as the truth and now we are trapped in a web of lies so thick and programming so thorough, most people refuse to even consider anything else.


What we are seeing today, the overreaching destruction of fundamental human rights by governments and their so called current "laws and legislation", was founded at what we thought was the end of WWII. Of course, the roots go back much further, a story for another time, but this was the setup for the new world order. Here is a brief overview of their deception.



The Nuremberg Code (1947)


The Nuremberg Code, something many people hold on to closely, is a work of corruption. There are endless accounts and events that all lead to the Nuremburg Code being a hastily put together, corrupted and falsified set of principles and of illegitimate standing as a legal document.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3121268/


In short, and one of the main reasonings behind this, is that during the Nuremburg Trial the existence of gas chambers was not established by physical and technical evidence which is normally required in any criminal trial. Articles 19 and 21 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, dispensed the charge of this constraint so the alleged gas chambers were neither studied nor described.


“The Tribunal shall NOT be bound by technical rules of evidence”- Article 19.


“The Tribunal shall NOT require PROOF OF FACTS of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof.”- Article 21.


Numerous accounts have attested to the entire Nuremburg Trials as being useless and bathed in corruption.


"[The Nuremberg] war-crimes trials were based upon a complete disregard of sound legal precedents, principles and procedures. The court had no real jurisdiction over the accused or their offenses; it invented ex post facto crimes; it permitted the accusers to act as prosecutors, judges, jury and executioners; and it admitted to the group of prosecutors those who had been guilty of crimes as numerous and atrocious as those with which the accused were charged. Hence, it is not surprising that these trials degraded international jurisprudence as never before in human experience." - Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, Ph.D. (Thompson, and Strutz ed., Doenitz at Nuremberg: A Re-appraisal,(Torrance: Institute for Historical Review, 1983) p.148\.)


"I may, and do, say that I have always regarded the Nuremberg prosecutions as a step backward in international law, and a precedent that will prove embarrassing, if not disastrous, in the future." - Honorable Justice Learned Hand (Thompson, and Strutz ed., p. 1\.)


https://codoh.com/library/document/reconsidering-the-nuremberg-trials/en/


The Nuremberg Principles form some of the bases of UN International Law and so you can see how something already corrupt is useless and dangerous for upholding any human right and that is clearly reflected by the UN. For further knowledge on the Nuremberg’s deep deception, refer to the documentary linked on the homepage of our website, “Europa: the Last Battle”.



The United Nations


The first Article in the UN’s International Law Handbook:

UN Book of International Law
.pdf
Download PDF • 6.21MB

States:


“The Purposes of the United Nations are: 1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace.”


This sounds like a positive move towards global peace until you comprehend that this one group of people has the power to decide what “side” in any nation is a threat and can therefore unleash its own army and forcibly remove it. This is indeed the most dangerous concept we could have ever allowed for our nation to be signed over to.


Since the Government and the Crown has sworn its allegiance to the UN agenda and since Australia, being a founding member of the UN, is very actively involved in progressing the UN’s agenda, it would be clear then, that any threat to the Government would constitute a “threat to peace” according to the views of UN International Law and so would trigger an invasion of UN foreign forces to overthrow that threat.


The UN’s goal is to insert itself into every nation on earth and be the controlling force that brings the world under submission of a privitised one world government. The UN work side by side with many organizations to bring this about, including the World Economic Forum, headed by Klaus Schwab who speaks a lot about bringing the world under the submission of a privitised ruling class.


It is very clear, through reading the UN Charter, that they were not written to bring about peace, but to keep the world in a perpetual state of war to achieve its goal. For in peace, there is no need for a global governing body. A global governing body would only be required in the case of a global crisis, of which we need not have if each nation was focused on the health and building of its own nation, free from the manipulation of forces with global agendas and international finance.


There were three main authors of the UN’s Charter. Alger Hiss, an American and dedicated communist who was caught spying for the Soviet Union, Leo Pasvolsky, Russian born American and member of the Council on Foreign Relations that promoted a world government and Vyacheslav Molotov, an official of the murderous Soviet Union whose criminal leaders expected the United Nations to bring about a world under communism. In fact, the UN was formed by the winners of WWII and the truth of that war indicates we are now in the hands of an agenda that has absolutely no intention of global peace or the sovereignty, individuality or protection and wellbeing of any nation, but rather an organized band of robbers and communists who would seize control of all nations through intellectual trickery, blackmail and war.


UN Charter, Chapter VII


Article 39


The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.


Article 40


In order to prevent an aggravation of the situation, the Security Council may, before making the recommendations or deciding upon the measures provided for in Article 39, call upon the parties concerned to comply with such provisional measures as it deems necessary or desirable. Such provisional measures shall be without prejudice to the rights, claims, or position of the parties concerned. The Security Council shall duly take account of failure to comply with such provisional measures.


Article 41


The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.


Article 42


Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.


https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/chapter-7



Conclusions


The winners of WW11 have intentionally weaved a thick web of lies and deceit to trick the people of our nation into their corrupt global agenda set on keeping the populations of the nations of the world trapped in a system of slavery.


Do you know who the winners of WWII truly were? If you haven't watched "Europa: the Last Battle", the episodes are linked on the homepage of our website.

643 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All